handbook Preliminary April 2026

Phase 1b — Intermediate Checkpoint

Symmetry Check Results — Node 4 preliminary

Status

The symmetry check (memo §8, recommended first step) is complete. The result is physically informative and sharpens the programme.


1 Parameter Regimes Tested

Reference parameters (memo §4): R = 25 µm, Q = 10⁷, G_x = 10¹² Hz/m, P_in = 1 mW, f_mech = 10 kHz.

  • F_rad/F_trap(σ_x) ~ 5×10⁻³
  • Result: A_E = 0 across all cases. No directional signal.

Strongly-coupled parameters: R = 10 µm, Q = 10⁸, G_x = 10¹³ Hz/m, P_in = 10 mW, f_mech = 1 kHz.

  • F_rad/F_trap(σ_x) ~ 200
  • Result: Massive directional asymmetry detected.

Conclusion: The discriminant requires a parameter regime where the dispersive radiation-pressure force is comparable to or exceeds the trap restoring force at the thermal displacement scale.


2 Symmetry Check Results (Strongly-Coupled Regime)

Case |r| [Hz/s] A_E σ(A_E) Significant?
thermal_only (G_x = 0) 1.94×10⁸ +3.8×10⁻⁴ 8.3×10⁻³ no
thermal_only 1.94×10¹⁰ +1.1×10⁻⁵ 4.0×10⁻⁴ no
thermal_only 1.94×10¹¹ +5.7×10⁻⁶ 3.4×10⁻⁴ no
mechanical_only (α = 0) 1.94×10⁸ −1.39×10⁴ 1.6×10¹ YES
mechanical_only 1.94×10¹⁰ −1.86×10⁴ 2.8×10¹ YES
mechanical_only 1.94×10¹¹ −9.3 3.1 YES
full 1.94×10⁸ −1.35×10⁴ 3.6×10¹ YES
full 1.94×10¹⁰ −1.85×10⁴ 2.8×10¹ YES
full 1.94×10¹¹ −8.5 3.1 YES

3 Interpretation

3.1 Which channels generate the asymmetry?

Two-channel (optical–mechanical) coupling is sufficient. The thermal channel contributes negligibly. Setting G_x = 0 kills the asymmetry entirely. Setting α = 0 preserves the full signal.

3.2 Physical mechanism

The asymmetry arises from sign-dependent feedback between the dispersive force and the particle displacement:

  • Up-chirp (+r): Displacement shifts resonance away from laser → negative feedback → force self-limits.
  • Down-chirp (−r): Displacement shifts resonance toward laser → positive feedback → force self-amplifies.

Result: down-chirp deposits far more energy (ΔE(−r) ≫ ΔE(+r)). A_E is consistently negative.

3.3 Chirp-rate dependence

|A_E| decreases from ~10⁴ at r_mech to ~10 at r_thermal. Consistent with the impulse limit (NB-2): at very high chirp rates, the mechanical mode cannot respond. The adiabatic limit (r → 0) has not been tested yet.

3.4 NB-3 (sign reversal)

No sign reversal observed. A_E is consistently negative across all rates. NB-3 remains open but is not supported at these parameters.


4 Implications for the Programme

4.1 The discriminant works — but requires strong coupling

The asymmetry is robustly nonzero in the strongly-coupled regime. The coastline’s core claim is theoretically supported. However, this requires F_rad ≫ F_trap at the thermal displacement scale.

4.2 Observable redefinition may be needed

The energy-transfer asymmetry A_E is a more sensitive observable than binary capture/escape. For Phase 2, the question to Node 1 should include: “Can the platform operate with parameters that put us in the strongly-coupled regime?”

4.3 The photothermal channel is a spectator

This simplifies the model considerably. The essential physics is optical–mechanical, not thermal.


5 Next Steps

  1. Adiabatic limit: Confirm A_E → 0 as r → 0 (required for NB-1 POSITIVE)
  2. Full A_E(r) curve: 3 decades, N ≥ 500, strongly-coupled params
  3. Parameter sensitivity: Map boundary between “no signal” and “detectable”
  4. Adiabatic-elimination validation: Compare with full 3-ODE model
  5. Dimensionless formulation: Express A_E in terms of η and timescale ratios

6 Assessment Against Success Criterion

Current status: Preliminary positive. The physics predicts a nonzero directional asymmetry, but the experimental parameter window is narrower than the reference set assumed.

The intermediate checkpoint (memo §9) is satisfied. Full Phase 1b deliverable pending.